Md. Wasimuddin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1433 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3763 of 2014 ====================================================== Md. Wasimuddin son of late Salimuddin resident of Mohalla - Rahamkha, P.O. - Lalbagh, P.S. - Laheriya Sarai, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .

2. Principal Secretary Industry Department cum Chairman Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariate, Patna.

3. Under Secretary Industry Deptt. Bihar at New Secretariat, Patna.

4. Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Mahesh Prasad Singh Advocate For the BIADA :

Mr. Prashant Pratap Advocate For the State :

Mr. Syed Md. Najmul Bari AC to SC-20 Mr. Mahendra Prasad Verma AC to SC-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date : 09-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The order, dated 14.03.2014, passed by the Learned Single Judge, disposing off the writ application, giving liberty to the petitioner to raise grievances, if any remains, after the validity of Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (Financial and Technological) Regulations, 2007, especially 3.2 was decided is subject matter of appeal in this L.P.A.

Patna High Court LPA No.1433 of 2014 dt.09-02-2018 2/2 The issue raised before the Learned Single Judge was whether an employee of BIADA, especially the appellant, was entitled to 300 days of earned leave instead of 240 days. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, rather extensively, we have failed to appreciate as to why the decision of the Learned Single Judge can be said to be erroneous or why a direction should be given upon the BIADA to enhance the number of earned leave from 240 days to 300, which decision had not been taken by the Board, while the present appellant was in service. Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) ( Nilu Agrawal, J) skm/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 13.02.2018 Transmission Date