← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1408/2018dfd for non appearance

M/S Royal Timber Company v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-12-09The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1408 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5611 of 2017 ====================================================== M/s Royal Timber Company, Kankarbagh, District- Patna, a Proprietorship Firm through its Proprietor Rajesh Kumar Gupta, son of Late Dashrath Kumar Gupta resident of D - Block, Pushp Vihar Apartment, Exhibition Road, Patna, P.S. Kotwali, District - Patna.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Environment & Forest Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, 5th Floor, Aranaya Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna - 800014 3.

The Conservator of Forest, Patna Circle, Patna. 4.

The Licensing Officer-cum-Divisional Forest Officer, Patna Forest Division, Patna.

5.

Brij Nandan Singh son of Sri Sachidanand Kishore Prasad Sinha resident of Mohalla - Kankarbagh Road, Patna, P.S. Kankarbagh, District - Patna. 6.

Pushkar Anand @ Pushkar Anand Singh son of Sri Brij Nandan Singh resident of Mohalla - Kankarbagh Road, Patna, P.S. Kankarbagh, District - Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 09-12-2019 Appellant has preferred this Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment dated 18.08.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 5611 of 2017, titled as M/s Royal Timber Company, Kankarbgh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors., whereby the writ application has been dismissed.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1408 of 2018(3) dt.09-12-2019 2/2 In spite of repeated calls, no one appeared to press the present appeal.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed in default. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) P.K.P./- U