Mukesh Singh Chandrawansi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36490 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2018 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== MUKESH SINGH CHANDRAWANSI Son of Yashwant Prasad Singh @ Jaswant Singh Chandrawansi Resident of Village - Sheopur, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 307 of 2018 for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioner happens to be husband of the deceased and he has never demanded any dowry. There is no specific allegation attributed to the petitioner. As a matter of fact, the deceased got some injuries after falling down on the hand
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36490 of 2019(3) dt.04-09-2019 2/2 pump and she succumbed before the injuries and died. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 29.10.2018. Hence the petitioner may be enlarged on regular bail. Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner is husband of the deceased and there is direct allegation of demand of dowry against him and non-fulfillment of the same, the deceased was done to death after pressing her neck. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of regular bail of this petitioner is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) Brajesh/- U T