← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9208/2023disposed

Ketu Kumar @ Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9208 of 2023 ====================================================== Ketu Kumar @ Ramesh Kumar Son of Shiv Pravesh Sah Resident of VillageSahar, P.S. Sahar, District-Bhojpur (Ara) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Bhojpur (Ara) 2.

Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur (Ara) 3.

Deputy Collector Land Reforms Sadar Ara District-Bhojpur (Ara) 4.

Sub Divisional Officer, Bhojpur (Ara) 5.

Circle Officer, Circle Office Sahar District-Bhojpur (Ara). 6.

Officer-in-Charge, Sahar Police Station District-Bhojpur (Ara) 7.

Md. Heyat Ali Son of Ahamed Ali Resident of Village-Nea Tola, Sahar P.S. Sahar District-Bhojpur (Ara).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2023 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction to the respondents to restrain the respondent no. 7, who is creating hindrance, nuisance and disturbance, in constructing the house on the purchased land of the petitioner.

2. However, after some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for disposal of the writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara / Respondent no. 1.

3. The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty, as indicated above. If such representation is filed within a period of

Patna High Court CWJC No.9208 of 2023(2) dt.11-12-2023 2/2 six weeks from today, the same shall be disposed of after hearing the parties in accordance with law preferably within a period of six months from the date of filing of such representation.

4. It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the authority concerned, the same shall be considered taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

5. With aforesaid direction, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U