Chandesh Singh @ Pappu Singh @ Chandresh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39064 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2022 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== CHANDESH SINGH @ PAPPU SINGH @ CHANDRESH KUMAR SINGH S/o Satendra Singh R/o village- Hasanpura, P.S.- Morhowrah, Distt.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 01-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Morhowrah P.S. Case no. 103 of 2022 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that the petitioner along with co-accused person came at the shop of informant's brother and started abusing him. On protest, the petitioner started hurling knife causing on his nose, hand and abdomen due to which informant's brother sustained injuries and the co-accused person also assaulted to him with Iron rod.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39064 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that to save neck from the counter case vide Complainant Case No. 460 of 2022, this case has been filed with frivolous allegation. The petitioner and informant are co-villagers and a rent dispute between them. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that total six injuries sustained by informant's brother namely, Shailesh Singh out of which two injuries are grievous in nature and this fact has been disclosed by the impugned order. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the direct allegation of assaulting is against petitioner and two injuries are grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T