Madhu Kumar Singh @ Madhu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37142 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2025 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Madhu Kumar Singh @ Madhu Singh son of Gupteshwar Singh VillageSherui, Ps- Rasulpur, Dist- Saran 2.

Mohit Singh son of vijay singh Village- Sherui, Ps- Rasulpur, Dist- Saran 3.

Bhupendra Singh Son of Chandeshwar Singh Village- Sherui, Ps- Rasulpur, Dist- Saran 4.

Akhilesh singh son of Bhuneshwar Singh Village- Sherui, Ps- Rasulpur, Dist- Saran 5.

Jai Prakash Singh son of Bhuneshwar Singh Village- Sherui, Ps- Rasulpur, Dist- Saran 6.

Atul Kumar singh @ Atul singh Son of Bhupendra Singh Village- Sherui, Ps- Rasulpur, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghwendra Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025 dated 22.02.2025 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 126(2), 115(2), 326(g), 351(2), 352 read with section 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused person are alleged to have attacked the house of the informant and set it on fire causing financial loss to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37142 of 2025(2) dt.02-07-2025 2/2 informant and all the family members of the informant also got injured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

7. This application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T