← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43119/2024bail granted

Md. Yasin Mian @ Rajan Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-10Mr. Justice Khatim Reza2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43119 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2024 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Md. Yasin Mian @ Rajan Mian Son of Md. Firoj @ Md. Afroj R/O Vill.- Barmohalla, Garhani, P.S.- Charpokhari, Dist.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in connection with Charpokhari P.S.Case No. 72 of 2024 dated 28.03.2024 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 506, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 20 to 25 accused persons came at the door of informant with lathi, danda and started abusing and assaulting. During scuffle, petitioner fired on the informant's son which did not hit to his son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation against the petitioner is that he fired upon the informant's son namely, Aryan but the said fire did not injured his son. It is submitted that the allegation of firing levelled

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43119 of 2024(2) dt.10-07-2024 2/2 against the petitioner to make the case serious but there is no sign of firing, found on the spot. It is further submitted that both the parties are co-villagers. The parties have compromise the matter and compromise petition has been filed in the learned court below.. The petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest/ surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Charpokhari P.S.Case No. 72 of 2024 he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara or appropriate Court Below, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

N.K/- (Khatim Reza, J) U T