Patna High CourtCWJC/2102/2015dismissed

Kumar Barun And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-02Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.2102 of 2015 dt.02-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2102 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Kumar Barun Son of Surendra Narain Singh, Resident of Village and Post Office - Bhalua Bhikar, Police Station and Block Tariya at present working on the post of Panchayat Teacher in upgraded Middle School Bhalua Shankardih, P.S. and Block Teria, District - Saran at Chapra.

2. Anand Kumar Singh, Son of Late Gayanand Singh, Resident of Village - Mungila, Post Office - Shankarpur Imamganj, Police Station and Block Paliganj, District - patna at present workign as Panchayat Teacher and Posted at Ram Lakhi Kanya Madhaya Vidalaya Jogiyan, Block - Ekma, District - Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Primary education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate Saran at Chapra.

5. The District Education Officer Saran at Chapra.

6. The District Program Officer Establishment Saran at Chapra.

7. The Block Development Officer Teria, District - Saran at Chapra.

8. The Block Development Officer, Ekma, District - Saran at Chapra.

9. The Block Education Officer, Teria, District - Saran at Chapra.

10. The Block Education Officer Ekma, District - Saran at Chapra. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP17- BINOD JI VERMA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-04-2015 A K Tripathi, J.

This writ application is dismissed because it cannot be treated at par with Vishwanath Pandey's case. The notification relating to Vishwanath Pandey clearly indicates that it was an exception and that was not required to be treated as precedent for others.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U