Dhananjay Singh @ B. K. Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35289 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2018 Thana- ARA RAIL P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Dhananjay Singh @ B. K. Singh Son of Late Ramnath Singh Resident of Mohalla- Mirganj, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 03-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Ara Rail P.S. Case No. 11 of 2018 registered for the offences under Sections 147,149,341,342,323,337,307,353,427 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 147,174,153 of the Railway Act and Section 3 of the Public Property Damage Act.

The allegation as per the FIR, is that on 16.02.2018 a mob of over 500 students disturbed the movement of trains and were not ready to listen. Amongst the persons who were creating disturbance, 18 persons were apprehended whose names have been mentioned in the FIR. Thereafter, it is alleged that from the sources it transpired that the disturbance had been controlled by the B.K. Singh Classes Coaching Institute and large number of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35289 of 2019(2) dt.03-06-2019 2/2 students from the said coaching institute were present there. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner happens to be the Director of the said B.K. Singh Classes Coaching Institute. The allegations made in the FIR are false and malicious and except the suspicion as made in the FIR, there is no material against the petitioner. Further the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State, taking into consideration the nature of allegations and the suspicion raised in the FIR as also the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Ara Rail P.S. Case No. 11 of 2018 is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000.- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Rail, Ara subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U