Jairam Singh @ Jai Ram Singh @ Jay Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45466 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-404 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== JAIRAM SINGH @ JAI RAM SINGH @ JAY RAM SINGH SON OF LATE NARAYAN SINGH RESIDENT OF MOHALLA/VILL- GURUBAZAR, P.S- BARARI, DISTRICT- KATIHAR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024 Heard Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Allegedly, the allegation against the petitioner is that he and other co-accused persons killed the son of the informant on account of enmity.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45466 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/3 levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. There is no material against the petitioner to support the prosecution case. He further submitted that earlier the bail application of the petitioner vide Cr. Misc. No.39428 of 2023 was permitted to be withdrawn in anticipation of final form to be submitted by police on 11.09.2023 with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application if the learned court below differs from the final form. Petitioner has moved before this Court by way of present bail application because cognizance has been taken against the petitioner after differing with the final form. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No.404 of 2023,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45466 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T