Ajay Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38613 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ajay Chaudhary S/O Kamal Chaudhary R/O Village- Bathua Bazar, PSPhulwariya, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Phulwariya P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 117(2), 324(4), 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

As per prosecution case, accusation against the petitioner is of repeatedly assaulting the informant on his head by means of knife with the intention to kill him. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 29-03-2025. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent/s, as per disclosure made in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38613 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025 2/3 paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties are agnates. It is next submitted that as per allegation, petitioner allegedly gave five knife blow upon the head of the informant and from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that informant sustained multiple punctures on his head but the nature is opined to be simple.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. There is specific allegation against the petitioner of giving knife blow upon the informant and injury sustained is also found to be multiple punctures, hence the intention of the petitioner is very clear to kill the informant.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being direct allegation of giving multiple knife blow upon the informant against the petitioner as also nature and gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. 8.

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial as expeditiously as possible without any undue delay and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38613 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025 3/3 unnecessary adjournments.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T