Maz Ansari @ Bara Babu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1826 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -274 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHEBGANJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Maz Ansari @ Bara Babu, son of Md. Akhtar @ Akhtar Ansari, resident of village-Pratap Patti, P.O. Karnaul, P.S. Sahebganj, District -Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 274 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner was caught sitting on a stolen motorcycle, which was in front of garage of the father of the petitioner.

Submission is of false implication and that the motorcycle was kept there by some one else for repairing purpose and the petitioner went there and sat on that motorcycle without having knowledge that the said motorcycle was stolen one. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is suffering in custody since 14.12.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1826 of 2017 (3) dt.13-02-2017 2/2 The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner was caught with stolen motorcycle. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the detention of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 274 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Vats/- U T