Md. Salman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2891 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -331 Year- 2016 Thana -KAHALGAON District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Md. Salman Son of Maqsood, Resident of Mohalla-Shiv Kumari Pahar, P.S. Kahalgaon, District Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 16.09.2016 in connection with Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 331 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Allegation against him is that he has stolen one bicycle, for which he has sufficiently been punished.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the period of custody and also that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000 (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2891 of 2017 (2) dt.10-02-2017 2/2 connection with Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 331 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part two appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

It is also made clear if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offence, in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U