Manoj Sah @ Manoj Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36435 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2020 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== Manoj Sah @ Manoj Kumar Sah Son Of Late Bindeshwari Sah Resident of Amari Kukraun, P.S. - Dhamdaha, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md Fazle Karim For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2021 Heard both sides through video conferencing.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dhamdaha P.S. Case No.111 of 2020 registered under Section 307 and other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Bipin Sah named the petitioner along with other twelve accused persons and alleged that they all came to the darwaza of the informant and assaulted him with iron rod on his head. The accused persons also assaulted Bablu Sah, Bhola Sah and other family members of the informant. The informant further alleged that Manoj Sah mostly assaulted the informant and other accused persons with iron rod.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the F.I.R., it would appear that Manoj Sah is named at the fag end of the F.I.R. and no specific allegation is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36435 of 2020(3) dt.24-06-2021 2/2 made against the petitioner but the informant alleged that Manoj Sah assaulted the informant and others. Eight persons were injured out of which four persons got grievous injuries. It is submitted that there is a land dispute and counter version. It appears that petitioner is alleged that he severely assaulted the informant and others. Eight persons got injuries out of which four persons got grievous injuries. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U T