Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41320/2026dismissed

Sukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-24Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41320 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-451 Year-2025 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sukesh Kumar S/o- Shankar Chaudhari Village- Dhekaha Vishunpur PSPipra Kothi District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishal Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ghodasahan P.S. Case No. 451 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals committed loot in the shop of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2026 having five criminal antecedents.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41320 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. During investigation, the name of the petitioner has come in his self-inculpatory statement.

7. Considering the fact that the petitioner has five criminal antecedents of serious nature as well as the fact that the materials have surfaced during the course of investigation to connect the petitioner with the crime, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T