← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9570/2021dismissed

Awadh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-06Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9570 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1031 Year-2019 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

AWADH YADAV, aged about 30 years (Male), Son of Kesho Yadav @ Keshwar Yadav.

2.

Fuliya Devi, aged about 50 years (Female), wife of Kesho Yadav @ Keshwar Yadav.

3.

Vikash Kumar, aged about 20 years (Male), Son of Anil Yadav. 4.

Raushan Kumar, aged about 19 years (Male), Son of Anil Yadav. 5.

Mohan Kumar, aged about 21 years (Male), Son of Dina Yadav. 6.

Sachin Kumar, aged about 20 years (Male), Son of Chuha Yadav. All Resident of Village - Unta Madarpur, Police Station and District - Jahanabad.

7.

Pintu Yadav, aged about 30 years (Male), Son of Baran Yadav, Resident of Village - Baribigha, Police Station - Dhanarua, District - Patna at Present Address - Unta Madarpur, Police Station and District - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 1031 of 2020 for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 353, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of allegation levelled against the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9570 of 2021(2) dt.06-12-2021 2/2 that they have assaulted the Police party, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T