Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2856/2017bail granted

Dilip Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2856 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2016 Thana -LAKHNAUR District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Dilip Ram S/o Bindeshwr Ram Resident of Village-Bhargama P.S.- Bheja, District-Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav Dr. Leela Wati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Lakhnaur P.S.Case No.84 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though there is allegation that he was caught with the stolen Motorcycle while stealing but the petitioner is in custody for about eight months and he has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. No doubt the petitioner has been caught red handed while stealing the motorcycle but as there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner and he is in custody for about eight months, as such let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2856 of 2017 (2) dt.10-02-2017 2/2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Lakhnaur P.S.Case No.84 of 2016 dated 15.05.2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U