Suresh Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41385 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2026 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Suresh Sahani S/o Rajendra Sahani Resident of village- Usarahi, P.SDewdha, District- Madhubani 2.

Rameshwar Sahani @ Rame S/o Yugeshwar Sahani @ Yuge Sahani Resident of village- Usarahi, P.S- Dewdha, District- Madhubani 3.

Rabindra Sahani S/o Rameshwar Sahani @ Rame Resident of villageUsarahi, P.S- Dewdha, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 47 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are accused of assaulting and killing the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner No. 2 is in custody since 29.03.2026 while Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 are in custody since 31.03.2026. It is further submitted that there is a land dispute

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41385 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/2 between the parties and there are no specific allegations against the petitioners. It is also submitted that as per the post-mortem report there are no external injuries on the body of the deceased.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the materials available on record, this application for regular bail is allowed.

7. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 47 of 2026.

8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T