Salendra Kumar @ Sahendra @ Karu Kumar @ Sahendra Yadav @ Salendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48110 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2019 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== SALENDRA KUMAR @ SAHENDRA @ KARU KUMAR @ SAHENDRA YADAV @ SALENDRA YADAV Son of Yadu Yadav Resident of Muhalla - Bibipur, P.S. - Gaurichak, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rudal Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-09-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. J.N. Thakur, learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 110 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 307of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

There is allegation that when the informant was sitting at his door, six persons on three motorcycles came there and the petitioner fired shot which hit at the back portion of head of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the informant is a dreaded criminal and there are so many cases against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48110 of 2021(4) dt.06-09-2022 2/2 him. He has also submitted that independent witnesses did not support the complicity of the petitioner.

The learned Addl.P.P. has submitted that petitioner is direct assailant. He has fired shot on the informant and the informant sustained grievous injury caused by firearm.

The witnesses have supported the occurrence in paragraph no. 5 and 25 of the case diary and there is an antecedent against the petitioner of serious offence under Section 302 of the IPC. The petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, it is rejected.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T