Vipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38031 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2025 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Vipin Kumar son of Rampravesh Rai Resident of Village- Samsipur, Diyara, Police Station- Bachhwara, District -Begusarai 2.

Vikki @ Vikki Kumar @ Vivek Kumar son of Rampravesh Rai Resident of Village- Samsipur, Diyara, Police Station- Bachhwara, District -Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No.398 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act which is pending before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against 4 named and one unknown accused persons including the petitioners against whom there is allegation that they in connivance with each other, assaulted the informant and his family members due to which injury has been caused. The further allegation is to shot by bullet to father of the informant due to which his father was admitted to hospital for treatment.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38031 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/2

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He further submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. The only allegation against the petitioner No.2 is that he has assaulted by lathi to the informant.

5. Learned Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioners is clean and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail, but fairly submits that there is allegation of assault against the petitioners.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, therefore the bail application of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

8. However, Trial Court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioners, if they surrender within 4 weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.

(D. Anshuman, J) Prakashmani/- U