Jainul Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4393 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -253 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAINPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Jainul Ansari, son of Taiyab Ansari, resident of village- Nanpura (Deuwa), P.S.- Chainpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Sunil, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Rabindra Kumar, APP Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 03-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Chainpur P.S. Case No. 253 of 2016 instituted under Section(s) 341, 323, 307, 504/34 Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua. It is alleged that altercation was taking place between sons of Alimuddin Ansari and Rashid Ansari for drainage. The informant, Hameed Ansari and others came to save them then this petitioner along with other accused persons armed with rifle, gun etc. arrived and started firing causing fire arm injury to Hameed Ansari, Azim Ansari and Iltaf Ansari.
Injury report of Hameed Ansari and Azim Ansari are available in para 115 and 116 of the supplementary case diary,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4393 of 2017 (4) dt.03-04-2017 2/2 wherein, the doctor has found fire arm injury on their persons, which were grievous in nature. The police has mentioned the injury report of Iltaf Ansari in para 43 of the supplementary case diary, wherein, the doctor has found one injury on his scapular region caused by hard and blunt substance.
In such circumstances and keeping in view the fact that two persons have sustained grievous injury, I am not inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner at this stage. Prayer for bail is rejected.
The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months if no substantive progress is made in the case. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T