Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43314/2014disposed

Pran Thakur And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-01Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43314 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2014 Thana -SIMRI District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Pran Thaur

2. Ajay Thakur Both sons of Late Dhruv Thakur

3. Ranjan Thakur @ Rajan Thakur Son of Late Lala Thakur

4. Jaggnath Thakur Son of Late Gupteshwar Thakur

5. Satish Thakur @ Chhatia Thakur Son of Jaggnath Thakur

6. Sujeet Thakur Son of Late Shyam Sunder Thakur

7. Jitendra Prasad @ Kumhar Son of Late Chhathu Kumhar

8. Rishimuni Thakur Son of Late Kanhaiya Thakur

9. Sri Prakash Paswan Son of Ram Laddu Paswan

10. Amit Thakur Son of Late Dhruv Thakur All Resident of VillageSahiyar, P.S.-Simari, District-Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ramdhari Yadav Son of Late Debu Yadav Resident of Village-Sahiyar, P.S.-Simari, District-Buxar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Varun Kumar, Adv.

Mr.Ashok Giri, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kr. 2(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The instant application is filed for quashing of the F.I.R. in Simari P.S. Case No. 118 of 2014 dated 02.07.2014. By efflux of time, the present application has become infructuous, as the court has reason to believe that after lodging of F.I.R. on 02.07.2014, the police must have completed the investigation, and either have submitted final form or charge-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43314 of 2014 (3) dt.01-09-2017 2/2 sheet. In any event, no useful purpose would be served, keeping the matter pending in this Court.

In case, the police has submitted charge-sheet against the petitioner and the court below has taken cognizance by passing any order adverse to the interest of the petitioner, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law by filing appropriate petition before the court concerned. With the aforesaid liberty, the application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) sushma/- U T