Rajat Poddar @ Rajat Kumar @ Sonu @ Gandhi @ Monu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36956 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2019 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== RAJAT PODDAR @ RAJAT KUMAR @ SONU @ GANDHI @ MONU, son of Aramod Kumar Poddar @ ARAMID PODDAR, Resident of Mohalla - Padri Ki Haveli, P.S. - Khajekalan, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 20-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Khajekalan P.S. Case No.176 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 354, 354-D and 506 Indian Penal Code.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that mere vague allegation has been made in the written report. Daughter of the informant was having love affair with the petitioner. In the written report, it is alleged that this petitioner used to tease daughter of the informant when she returned from the school and also forced her to go with him. The daughter of informant raised objection then he used to give threat to kill her. Petitioner is in custody since 17.04.2019 having clean
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36956 of 2019(2) dt.20-06-2019 2/2 antecedents. There is no mention of specific date of alleged occurrence in the written report.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM, Patna City, in connection with Khajekalan P.S. Case No.176 of 2019, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T