Arvind Yadav @ Arvind Kumar Yadav @ Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37097 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-529 Year-2024 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Arvind Yadav @ Arvind Kumar Yadav @ Arvind Kumar S/O Mehi Yadav @ Mehilal Yadav R/O Village- Rampur Madho, P.S.- Kuchaikote, DistrictGopalganj 2.

Ajay Yadav S/O Mehi Yadav @ Mehilal Yadav R/O Village- Rampur Madho, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case no. 529 of 2024, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, six named accused persons including the two petitioners herein are said to have come variously armed at the time of measurement of the land in question. It is stated that the petitioners herein armed with daab and iron rod assaulted the informant causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case over a land

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37097 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 dispute between the parties which is evident from the contents of the F.I.R itself. It is submitted that the injury report does not support the prosecution case and there is an inordinate delay of 4 days in lodging of the F.I.R without any explanation for the same. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioners in the F.I.R., the parties to the case being agnates, there being land dispute between the parties, the contents of the injury report and the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that both the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case no. 529 of 2024 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T