Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36694 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2019 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Yadav, Son of Komal Yadav Resident of VillageKarmauni, Police Station-Dobhi, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the present case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019 arising out of Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No.54 of 2019 registered for offences punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 30 (a) (d) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and Sections 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner had filed a Cr. Misc. No. 12556 of 2020 for grant of bail, which was rejected by this Court vide order dated 23.06.2020 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after one year of his judicial custody and now the petitioner has completed more than one year of his judicial custody as he is in judicial custody since 08.11.2019.

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36694 of 2020(2) dt.05-01-2021 2/2 case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019 arising out of Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 54 of 2019 with a condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds with further condition that one of the bailor will be the close relative of the petitioner.

That apart, in view of the antecedents of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Officerin-charge of the concerned police station within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the police station concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T