Jaya Jit Kumar @ Jay Jeet Kr. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5076 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -102 Year- 2016 Thana -MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- GAYA ====================================================== Jaya Jit Kumar @ Jay Jeet Kr., S/o Basudeo Yadav, Resident of VillageGhantadih, P.S.- Magadh University, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 30 (a) and 32(2) of Bihar Excise Prohibition Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the alleged recovery is 19 bottles wine having 375 ml. each of Royal Stag. He has got no criminal antecedent. He is in custody for two months and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that he has got no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for two months, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5076 of 2017 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IX, Gaya, in connection with Magadh University P.S. Case no. 102 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If similar offence is repeated in future by the petitioner, his bail bond shall stand cancelled. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T