← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45906/2025allowed

Ranjeet Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-11Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45906 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60896 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2023 Thana- GURARU District- Gaya ====================================================== Ranjeet Paswan S/O Lakhan Paswan @ Chandrika Paswan R/O Village- Fafar, Police Station- Guraru, District -Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sumitra Devi W/O Ranjeet Paswan R/O Village- Fafar, P.S- Guraru, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Rabia Gulnaz, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for modification of order dated 28.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 60896 of 2024, whereby the anticipatory bail had been granted to the petitioner on the condition that the petitioner would either keep the opposite party no.2 at a place where he resides or he would take care of her personal expenses. It has been indicated in para-5 that in case the petitioner goes back on his words, the opposite party no.2 is at liberty to approach before the learned Court below for cancellation of anticipatory bail of the petitioner. The order is clear to extent that the liberty of cancellation of the anticipatory bail has been granted to opposite party no.2. There is no order of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45906 of 2025(2) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 the personal appearance of opposite party no.2.

3. It has been submitted that although she is staying along with the petitioner but is refusing to make appearance in the Court. In case, the opposite party no.2 is anyway aggrieved by the petitioner, she would exercise her liberty to file an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. With the aforesaid clarification, this modification application stands disposed of. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T