Patna High CourtL.P.A/722/2016dismissed

The State Of Bihar And ORS v. Mostt. Parwati Devi And ANR

2017-07-03The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.722 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Engineering Organization (R.E.O. Only ), Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Shashi Shkehar Sharma.

2. The Engineer - in - Special, P.W.D. Bihar, Patna namely Sri Baban Ram.

3. The Engineer - in - Chief - Cum - Additional Secretary - Cum - Special, R.E.O. Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Janak Ram Rural Works Department.

4. The Chief Engineer, Division - I, R.E.O. Patna, namely Sri Dharmdeo Chaudhary.

5. The Block Development officer, Tarari, District Bhojpur, namely Sri Birendra Kumar Singh.

6. The Director General Provident Fund, Bihar Patna, namely Sri Anirudh Prasad Singh.

7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Bhopur at Arrah, namely Birendra Kumar Tarun.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. Mostt. Parwati Devi Late Yogendra Prasad Singh R/o village - Rampur Chaukra, P.O. + P.S. Piri Bazar, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner-Respondent 1st Set.

2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent No.9-Respondent 2nd Set. =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 03-07-2017 None appears for the appellants. None appeared on the last two dates also. There is delay of more than 2 years and 53 days in filing of this appeal and we find that apart from the fact that the delay has not been properly explained, the order impugned in this appeal filed goes to show that the counsel for the appellants withdrew the appeal with liberty to approach this Court with an appropriate application in future, if so

Patna High Court LPA No.722 of 2016 dt.03-07-2017 2/2 advised. Instead of filing an appropriate application in the matter that was disposed of, this fresh appeal is filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. Keeping in view the nature of the order passed, we see no reason to make any indulgence. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 04.07.2017 Transmission Date