Deo Murat Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42046 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2024 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Deo Murat Chaudhary S/O Late Moti Chaudhary 2.
Ram Autar Chauhary S/O Deo Murat Chaudhary 3.
Sunita Devi W/O Ram Murat Chaudhary 4.
Sudarshan Chaudhary S/O Deo Murat Chaudahry 5.
Nisha Devi @ Nisha W/O Sudarshan Chaudhary All Are R/O Village- Bhawrah Kali Tola, P.S- Nokha, Distt.- Rohtas. 6.
Kishun Chaudhary S/O Late Balgovind Chaudhary 7.
Hare Ram Chaudhary S/O Kishun Chaudhary 8.
Jagan Chaudhary S/O Late Sigasan Chauhary No.6 To 8 Are R/O Village- Siyawak, P.S- Baghaila, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shashi Kant, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143,147,307,323,341 and 504 of the IPC in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No.95 of 2024.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 15.03.2024 she had gone to cover her stone chips
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42046 of 2024(2) dt.25-07-2024 2/3 and sand when Deomurat Chaudhary came and started throwing filth on the stone chips and sand which was objected by the informant, thereafter, it is alleged that all the accused persons started assaulting her by lathi, kicks and puches, causing injury on her head and when her daughter intervened she was also assaulted by the accused persons causing injury on her leg.
4. The learned counsel submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and on account of dispute relating to stone chips, the present occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that even injury is suffered by the injured is simple in nature.
5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Ist, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No.95 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42046 of 2024(2) dt.25-07-2024 3/3 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T