Nitu Devi @ Nitu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39483 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2026 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Nitu Devi @ Nitu Sharma W/o- Ayodhya Sharma Resident of vill- Sadarpur PS-Barhariya Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Kumari Anupam, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown miscreants have entered in the shop of the informant and have stolen huge amount of jewellery.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of the investigation, one Ajit @ Ramu has given his confessional statement, and in his confessional statement he has named the son of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39483 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 He further submits that the petitioner is a lady having no criminal antecedent. He further submits that though the recovery has been made of some silver ornaments from the house of the petitioner but those ornaments belong to the petitioner. No TIP of the said jewellery has been conducted and the jewellery which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is normally found in the home. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Siwan in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T