Vipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38958 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Vipin Kumar S/O Kailash Saw R/O Village- Mananpur Tola- Ammatari, P.SKawakol, Distt.- Nawada. (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Indradeo Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Kauwakol P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025 registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 117(3), 118(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to allegation, the FIR named accused persons equipped with Lathi, Khanti, iron rod, knife started opposing the informant after uttering that the informant has won the election of PACCS and he could not be saved and in consequence thereof, the accused persons started assaulting the informant, as a result of which, he sustained injuries.
4. The specific allegation against the petitioner is of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38958 of 2025(4) dt.05-12-2025 2/3 assaulting Arvind Kumar with iron rod. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He is a person of clean antecedent and the injury found on the persons of Arvind Kumar is simple in nature. Learned Senior Counsel has also submitted that the other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the anticipatory bail applications of co-accused Prahlad Kumar, Nitish Kumar and Karu Sah have already been rejected to which, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has replied that the co-accused persons whose bail applications have been rejected, were the author of the injuries which were found grievous in supplementary injury report though it was challenged by the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38958 of 2025(4) dt.05-12-2025 3/3 Nawada in connection with Kauwakol P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/482(2) of BNSS, 2023. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T