Anamul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40882 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -280 Year- 2013 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Anamul Haque son of Abdul Rahman, resident of Village-Basmatiya, Police Station-Narpatganj(Basmatiya), District-Araria .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pushpa Sinha 2 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2015 Petitioner being husband of the informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 498A/34 of the I.P.C. The basic accusation is of torture for nonfulfilment of dowry demand. On instructions, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour. A statement to that effect has been made in para 10 of the petition. Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40882 of 2014 (2) dt.11-02-2015 2/2 connection with Narpatganj(Basmatiya) P.S. Case No. 280 of 2013.

Let learned Court below issue notice to the informant and fix a date for her appearance. On appearance, the petitioner will take the informant to her matrimonial house to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. The provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned Court below in three eventualities (i) On substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony within a period of one year (ii) If the informant fails to appear before learned Court below (iii) If the informant is reluctant to reconcile the issue.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/- U T