← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39562/2023disposed

Rizwan v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-18Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39562 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2022 Thana- KOCHADHAMAN District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Rizwan S/O Gulfam Shah R/O Ujjani, P.S- Kotwali, Ujjani, Distt.- Badaun (Uttar Pradesh) .... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aamir Hayat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 15.11.2022 in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 288 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 14.11.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)/B/22/23/29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (N.D.P.S. Act).

3. According to prosecution case, recovery of total 25.910 kgs of Ganja has been made.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that from bare perusal of the F.I.R. and seizure list, 8.810 kgs of Ganja like substance was recovered from the black color bag of the petitioner and altogether 25.910 kgs of Ganja has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and other co-accused persons. He further submits that the recovered contraband was found from the possession of the petitioner, which was less than the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39562 of 2023(3) dt.18-09-2023 2/3 commercial quantity. He further submits that the co-accused person, namely, Muzammil has been granted bail vide order dated 30.05.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 15928 of 2023 by the coordinate Bench of this Court and the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 15.11.2022.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the other hand on the basis of material available on record and Case Diary opposed the prayer for grant of bail of the petitioner and submits that altogether 25.910 kg of Ganja was recovered from the possession of petitioner and other co-accused persons and the recovered contraband was more than the commercial quantity and the F.S.L. report also confirms that the recovered contraband is Ganja. Apart from the aforesaid, the petitioner is involved in one criminal antecedent which is pertaining to N.D.P.S. matter but fairly submits that the co-accused persons have been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39562 of 2023(3) dt.18-09-2023 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Kishanganj, in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 288 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Aditi U T