Sattar Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49257 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2021 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

SATTAR ANSARI Son of Meharban Ansari Resident of Village - Balha Maksudan, P.S.- Pupri, District - Sitamarhi.

2.

Saida Khatoon Wife of Ful Mohammad Ansari 3.

Nirsi Khatoon Wife of Gaffar Ansari Both 2 and 3 are resident of Village - Balha Maksudan, P.S.- Pupri, District - Sitamarhi.

4.

Shakil Ansari Son of Sattar Ansari Resident of Village - Balha Maksudan, P.S.- Pupri, District - Sitamarhi.

5.

Wakil Ansari @ Aukim Ansari Son of Sattar Ansari Resident of Village - Balha Maksudan, P.S.- Pupri, District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2022 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application as against petitioners No. 1, 4 and 5. Permitted to be withdrawn.

It is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn as against petitioners No. 1, 4 and 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State video conferencing.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49257 of 2021(2) dt.11-02-2022 2/2 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 05/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner No. 2 and petitioner No. 3 are female members of the family and it has been submitted that they have been falsely implicated in this case and there is no evidence against these petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed. Accordingly, let the petitioner No. 2 and Petitioner No. 3 above named be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of ten weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi, in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 05/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T