Panchratana Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41424 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2024 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Panchratana Devi, Wife of Surendra Ram R/O Vill.- Patariya, P.S.- Sahar, Dist.- Bhojpur 2.

Kush Kumar, Son of Surendra Ram R/O Vill.- Patariya, P.S.- Sahar, Dist.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivam Kumar Mr. Diwakar Mr. Sudhakar Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, being mother in-law and brother in-law of the deceased, have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that daughter of the informant was married to Lav Kush Kumar, son of petitioner no.1 in the Year 2020 and after marriage, the son of the petitioner no.1 along with his wife separated and started staying separately. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41424 of 2024(2) dt.11-07-2024 2/2 further submitted that informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and the entire allegation hinges around suspicion. It is also submitted that husband of the deceased is not an accused in the instant case rather the mother in-law, father in-law and brother in-law have been implicated. It is further submitted that it appears that the informant inconnivance with Lav Kush got the petitioners implicated in the instant case with general and omnibus allegation.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JMFC, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sahar P. S. Case No.12 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T