Rupesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38019 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2025 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Rupesh Kumar Son of Shyam Kishor Yadav Resident of village-Bhan Tekthi, Ward No.-06, P.S.- Madhepura, District-Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 580 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that one country-made pistol and one live cartridge were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further alleged that one Brajesh Kumar had engaged Sudhanshu Kumar and Rupesh Kumar to kill the husband of Soni Kumari, namely, Shashi Ranjan Jaiswal. In connection with the said allegation, the house of the petitioner was searched, during which the aforesaid recovery was allegedly made.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38019 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.01.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 580 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T