Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2612/2017bail granted

Butan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-16Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2612 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2612 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2016 Thana -TEGHRA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Butan Rai Son of Ram Karan Rai Resident of Village- Gaura-1, & P.S. Teghra, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kaushal Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kanhaiya Kishore ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 29 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)A and 26 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, two loaded country made pistols were recovered from possession of the petitioner.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 31.01.2016, he has got some cases wherein he is on bail, from earlier the petitioner was not involved in the case of recovery of Arms and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration as he remained in custody for more than a year.

Learned APP fairly submits that now lenient view can be taken.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2612 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 29 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T