← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1796/2017rejected

Md. Khurshid v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-19Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1796 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -501 Year- 2016 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ====================================================== Md. Khurshid, S/o Late Seraj Alam, Resident of Mohalla-Machharhata Ward No-22, P.S.-Buxar (Town), District-Buxar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Surendra Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buxar (Town) P.S Case No. 501 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 506, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. Allegedly, the petitioner, Md. Bhuar and Md. Parwez Alam surrounded the informant and his brother and started abusing, they knocked the informant down. The petitioner was having scissor, Bhuar was having a pistol and Md. Parwez was having a knife. They started assaulting. Md. Naushad @ Md. Bhuar opened fire also and assaulted with butt of the pistol causing injury to the informant at several places.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1796 of 2017 (2) dt.19-01-2017 2/2 Submission is of false implication and that no injury has been found grievous in nature. There was no intention to commit murder and, as such, offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is not made out and the rest allegations are ornamental and super addition.

Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that ten sharp cut injuries and one lacerated wound was found on the person of the informant which shows the intention of the accused person. The doctor has reserved his opinion regarding injury no.5 which is sharp cut injury on the back of skull and during investigation the witnesses have also supported the allegation.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected, in connection with Buxar (Town) P.S Case No. 501 of 2016 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T