Gangadhar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37081 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2025 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka ====================================================== Gangadhar Kumar S/O Jaykant Yadav R/O Village- Mirzapur, PS- Barahat, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 336(4), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons were arrested by the police with two stolen motorcycles and when valid documents were demanded regarding the motorcycles, they failed to produce any valid documents for the same.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37081 of 2025(2) dt.19-06-2025 2/2 present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. No specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. It is further submitted that no any FIR has been made for the stolen motorcycles. The petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T