← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39756/2022dismissed

Kamlesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-31Mr. Justice S. Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39756 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2019 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== KAMLESH SINGH S/o Kedar Singh R/o village- Nega Bigha, P.S.- Salaiya, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of Arms Act. Earlier prayer for regular bail of the petitioner has been twice rejected as detailed in paragraph no. 2 of this application.

Informant has alleged that on 14.03.2019 at about 7.55 PM while he was shutting his shop and returning, he heard

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39756 of 2022(3) dt.31-08-2022 2/3 sound of firing and saw that some one has shot dead his father and the person who had fired was caught by family members and from his possession one country made pistol and one fired cartridge was recovered. It is further alleged that 7-8 miscreants had entered his house to commit robbery and while they were fleeing away the villagers assembled there caught hold the accused who had fired upon his father.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no eye witness of the occurrence. Petitioner is in custody since 18.03.2019.

Report was called with respect to stage of trial and it is stated in the report that trial is likely to conclude within 9 months (approx).

In view of robbery committed in the house of informant in which father of informant was killed by firing and recovery of pistol from the possession of petitioner who was apprehended on the spot and on perusing the report of trial court, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39756 of 2022(3) dt.31-08-2022 3/3 trial of the petitioner and conclude the same within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veenaU