Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15267/2017bail granted

Sanjeet Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15267 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -167 Year- 2016 Thana -PANCHRUKHI District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Sanjeet Prasad, Son of Late Akalu Prasad, resident of village - Laheji, P.S. M H Nagar, District - Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Sessions Case No.78 of 2017 arising out of Pachrukhi P.S.Case No.167 of 2016, G.R.No.4306 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 272, 273 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has clean antecedent and he is in custody for about five months. The allegation is about recovery of 24 ltrs. of liquor. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent of the petitioner as well as the fact that he is in custody for about five months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15267 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. District and Sessions Judge, 2nd Siwan Dist.-Siwan in connection with Sessions Case No.78 of 2017 arising out of Pachrukhi P.S.Case No.167 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U