Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18869/2017bail granted

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kr Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-03Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18869 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -89 Year- 2015 Thana -ANDHRAMATH District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kr Yadav Son of Digamber Yadav @ Digamber Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village- Goth Narhaiya, P.S. Andhra Math, District Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail which was earlier rejected vide Criminal Misc. No. 31461 of 2016 vide order dated 14.09.2016 by this Court on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 27-11-2015 and up till now charges have not been framed and, as such, in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. The petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail, if the trial is not concluded within six months.

The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that there is no progress in the trial.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18869 of 2017 (3) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Andhra Math P.S. Case No. 89 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T