Laxmi Rani Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5938 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Laxmi Rani Pandey D/o Sri Kailash Pandey, w/o Sri Om Prakash Pandey, resident of village + P.O. Shivpur Sakara, P.S.- Ashanv, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Siwan.
4. The District Education Officer, Siwan.
5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan.
6. The Presiding Officer, the District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal, Siwan.
7. The Block Education Officer, Nautan, District- Siwan.
8. The Block Development Officer, Nautan, District- Siwan.
9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Semariya, Block- Nautan, District- Siwan.
10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Semariya, Block- Nautan, Distrct- Siwan.
11. Dhananjay Kumar Singh S/o Rajendra Singh resident of village + P.O.- Sevarapur, P.S.- Bhaiwara, District- Siwan.
12. Gita Kumari C/o. Krishna Raj Rai, resident of Village & P.O.- Phalawan, P.S. Nautan, District- Siwan.
13. Sunita Kumari D/o Sri Veyas Rai, resdient of Village & P.O.- Semariya, P.S. Nuatan, District- Siwan.
14. Priyanka Kumari wife of Vivekanand Singh resident of village & P.O.- Akdauga, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP22- G.P. OJHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-06-2015 The impugned order, contained in Annexure-9, is hereby quashed. The Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Siwan, is directed to pass a fresh order on the merits of the case of the petitioner, which is Appeal No. 688/11.
The Court, in fact, is constrained to observe that probably the Member
Patna High Court CWJC No.5938 of 2015 dt.22-06-2015 2 / 2 does not know what a quasi judicial proceeding is all about especially when the petitioner was not a party to the adjudication made in Case No.211/11. Let a decision be rendered after hearing the parties within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order. The Member should be careful in using the language which he has used, which is without basis.
Writ application is allowed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U