Anmol Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14997 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -72 Year- 2011 Thana -BARGANIA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Anmol Singh Son of Raju Singh, Resident of Village- Adambandh , P.S.- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi, .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bairgania P.S.Case No.72 of 2011, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused persons was present there and some of the accused exploded the bomb and fired on the deceased.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation of firing or explosion of bomb has been attributed against the petitioner and he is simply member of the mob and he has remained in custody for more than three months. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who could not controvert the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14997 of 2017 (4) dt.26-04-2017 2/2 above facts.

Having heard both sides and in view of submissions of the learned counsel of the petitioner as well as the fact that the learned A.P.P. could not controvert the above facts, as such, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No.72 of 2011. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U