Parmanand Sah B.A.S. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17509 of 2014 ====================================================== Parmanand Sah (B.A.S.), son of Nageshwar Sah, resident of village- Affour Ke Purab Tola, P.O.- Affour (Khairah), District- Chapra, Bihar, presently under suspension and headquarter at Commissioner Office, Munger Division, Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Y.V.Giri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Nikhil Agrawal, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anshuman Singh, GP-24 Mr.Rajeev Shekhar, AC to GP-24 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2015 Heard the parties.

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the validity and correctness of the resolution dated 14.02.2014 (Annexure-1) issued under the signature of the respondent no.3, whereby the petitioner has been placed under suspension. He has also prayed for certain incidental reliefs on account of the aforesaid order of suspension.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition the impugned order of suspension has been revoked and, therefore, he has received instructions not to press the present writ petition so far impugned order of suspension is concerned. However, he

Patna High Court CWJC No.17509 of 2014 (2) dt.20-01-2015 further submits that for remaining grievances, he may be granted liberty to approach the competent authority for redressal of those valid grievances.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file a representation with respect to remaining grievances before the competent authority.

It is expected that, if such a representation is filed on behalf of the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority of the respondent State strictly in accordance with law.

The wit petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U