Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Gope @ Dharmendra Kumar @ Hero v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37167 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2019 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Gope @ Dharmendra Kumar @ Hero S/O Late Abhilakh Rai R/O Village- Khapura, PS- Bidhupur, Distt-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rudal Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 453 of 2019 dated 10.11.2019 registered for the offences punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants boarded on Scorpio vehicle came and fired and robbed the bag of the informant, containing Rs. 1,09,800/- and a motorcycle and they fled away leaving their Scorpio vehicle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37167 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of coaccused, Mukul Kumar. No T.I Parade has been conducted by the prosecution. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 13.03.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 65186/2022. The petitioner has 34 criminal anticendents in which he is on bail in 9 cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2021 as stated in para 4 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 453 of 2019, with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37167 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T