Jago Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40286 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2026 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Jago Yadav Son of Late Bineshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Guaghoghra, Police Station - Kawakol, District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 132, 324(4), 324(5), 115(2), 126(2), 308 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has restrained the police from constructing any structure on the disputed land.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a Title Suit No. 227 of 2017 which is filed by the petitioner in the Court of learned Munsif, Nawada and the land belongs to him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40286 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 It has further been submitted that only allegation against the petitioner is that he has stopped the work. He has not assaulted anybody and as the land on which the work was being done is under dispute and the petitioner has filed Title Suit, he has been framed in this case. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.04.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Nawada in connection with Kawakol P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T