Sanjeet Rai @ Sanjiv Kumar @ Sandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39732 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2020 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sanjeet Rai @ Sanjiv Kumar @ Sandeep Kumar Son of Kishor Rai Resident of Village - Jafrabad, Police Station - Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.), District - Vaishali at Hajipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, police got secret information that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, are involved in transaction of stolen two wheeler and acting thereupon, house of the accused persons was searched and two stolen motorcycles were recovered parked near the river bank behind the house of this petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39732 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/3 committed no offence. The alleged stolen motorcycles were not recovered from the house of this petitioner rather they were recovered from near the bank of river and petitioner has got no concern with the seized motorcycles. Save and except suspicion, there is no material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in the alleged offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, fact that no stolen motorcycle was recovered from possession of this petitioner and clean antecedents, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 63 of 2020, subject to condition as laid

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39732 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 3/3 down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T