Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36170/2019dismissed

Amit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-03Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36170 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2017 Thana- NAGARNAUSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Amit Yadav, aged about 23 years, Son of Mundrika Yadav, Resident of Village - Ahiyatpur, P.S.- Nagarnausa, Dist.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Mukherjee, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard Sri Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Nitya Nand Tiwary, learned counsel for the informant.

This is second attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2017 in Sessions Trial No.745 of 2017, arising out of Nagarnausa P.S. Case No.94 of 2017 registered for offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by a reasoned order dated 04.05.2018 vide Cr.Misc.No.26929 of 2018. At the time of earlier rejection, it was noticed that trial was going on.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36170 of 2019(2) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 Sri Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to persuade the Court that in the evidence, nothing has been brought on record showing complicity of the petitioner in the case. Accordingly, he has made a prayer for granting bail to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the informant submits that in the case, evidence has already been completed and the case is fixed for argument.

In view of the fact that the case is at the fag end, there is no reason to entertain the prayer for bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) nawalkrs/- U T