Bhuar Ojha @ Mukteshwar Ojha v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.942 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2008 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== BHUAR OJHA @ MUKTESHWAR OJHA S/o LATE RAJ KISHORE OJHA R/o VILLAGE-OJHAWALIA, P.S- SHAHPUR, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR (BIHAR) ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR BIHAR 2.

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. PATNA 3.

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA ZONE, PATNA. PATNA 4.

THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SHAHABAD RANGE, SASARAM. SASARAM 5.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BUXAR. BUXAR 6.

THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE-CUM-INVESTIGATING OFFICER, BRAHMPUR (NAINIZORE) P.S, DISTRICT-BUXAR. BUXAR. ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Subhash Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondents :

Mr.Manish Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 18-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has filed the present criminal writ petition for setting aside the charge sheet/final form no. 31 of 2018, dated 25.12.2018 arising out of Brahmpur (Nainizore) P.S. Case No. 92 of 2008. Learned counsel submits that the present charge sheet/final form has been submitted by the respondents in the teeth of directions/observations passed by the order, dated 25.02.2013 in Cr.W.J.C. No. 510 of 2011 by this Court.

Counsel for the petitioner in crux submits that there is

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.942 of 2021(2) dt.18-03-2023 2/2 willful disobedience of the Court's order, dated 25.02.2013, passed in Cr.W.J.C. No. 510 of 2011.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the order has been complied and the petitioner has filed this case unnecessarily.

This Court is of the view that the grievance for which the petitioner has come can not be entertained in the writ Court. In this view of the matter, this criminal writ application is hereby rejected. Liberty is there that petitioner may take its recourse before the appropriate forum. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Shamshad/- U T